Specific Claims Research, Development and Submission Program: Guidelines

Effective as of December 1, 2021

On this page

1. Introduction

Specific claims deal with past wrongs committed by the Crown against First Nations. The Government of Canada works with First Nations under the Specific Claims Policy to resolve specific claims through negotiated settlements.

2. Objective

First Nations are responsible for researching their own claims and submitting those claims to Canada. The objective of this contribution funding program is to provide First Nations with financial assistance to support them in researching, developing and submitting their claims to be considered under the Specific Claims Policy and Process Guide.

Under the section Advancing reconciliation with Indigenous peoples, Budget 2019 committed $8 million of additional funding per year over 5 years to help First Nations research and develop their specific claims, on top of the $4 million per year of ongoing funding. The Government of Canada has recently announced a two-year extension of the additional funding, bringing the total budget envelope to $12 million in fiscal years 2024 to 2025 and 2025 to 2026.

3. Who can apply

Recipients eligible to receive funding under this program are the following:

Bands and First Nations who have provided a mandate to a claims research unit to conduct a claim research and development on their behalf cannot receive funding separately from the Government of Canada for the same claim.

First Nations who are considering a change of mandate must work in collaboration with the claims research units to determine the best approach in order to avoid duplication of work and funding. Continued discussions on potential approaches to better respond to these requests in the future are underway with the claims research units and Negotiation Support Directorate working group.

4. Application deadline

The deadline to submit a proposal for research funding is January 31 of each fiscal year or the next business day where January 31 falls on a weekend or statutory holiday (for example, for fiscal year 2022 to 2023, funding proposals are to be submitted by January 31, 2022).

Should funding remain unallocated after the consideration of the submissions received by January 31, Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs Canada could offer a second opportunity to submit new or revised funding proposals in September or October.

5. Eligible activities and expenditures

Eligible activities are those supporting the fully documented specific claims submissions (Appendix 1: Stages of specific claims research for measurable progress), including, but not limited to:

Eligible expenditures are those supporting the eligible activities which may include, but is not limited to:

Other eligible expenditures are those associated with the planning and delivery of the National Claims Research Workshop, as well as those supporting the participation of claims research units and First Nations in the annual research directors meeting. These events provide opportunity to support the capacity, connectedness and effectiveness of the claims research community.

Eligible expenditures may include, but is not limited to:

Consistent with the department's collaborative approach to specific claims resolution, an eligible recipient may also seek research funding after a claim is submitted when the eligible recipient determines through engagement with the Specific Claims Branch that additional research activities could assist in the assessment of the claim by addressing evidentiary gaps or clarifying matters under consideration.

The stages of specific claims research for measurable progress includes activities undertaken after a First Nation receives a letter indicating whether the Government of Canada is in a position to negotiate the claim or not. These activities could include historical, anthropological, ethnographic, oral history research and corresponding legal work.

Consistent with the department's collaborative approach to specific claims resolution, these activities would be intended to build a common understanding of the claim, expand the scope of the claim or resolve an issue that is rooted in the history which could affect the settlement. Examples of claims where this could apply are:

Specific Claims Branch is not involved in the administration of funding proposals. However, for collaborative approaches to specific claims resolution, the Negotiation Support Directorate will ask the Specific Claims Branch to confirm that the work plan received supports additional research that the eligible recipient and the Specific Claims Branch have identified as useful in supporting further development of the claim. These discussions will help inform the scope of the project and how best to support it.

6. Ineligible activities and expenditures

Ineligible activities and expenditures are those that are not related to the research and development of specific claims and activities that are already funded through loan funding in support of negotiations. Claims which the Government of Canada has accepted for negotiation in the specific claims process are eligible for negotiation support funding.

To find out more on funding eligibility and the application process, visit:

Activities associated with the costs of litigation and the Specific Claims Tribunal are also not eligible. Funding can be provided to support First Nations who choose to file a specific claim with the Specific Claims Tribunal of Canada.

To find out more on the eligibility and application process, visit:

Travel costs which exceed the rates set for in the Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat's Travel Directive are not eligible for funding.

Honorariums cannot be provided for First Nations representatives who receive a salary through band administered funding.

7. Maximum amount of research funding

Research funding for the development and submission of a specific claim

The maximum amount of research funding per fiscal year for an active claim is determined based on the number of requests received, the annual budget available, the application of benchmark and rates, as well as complexities (up to $40,000 per active claim).

Funding is provided for claims that are actively being researched and progress reported as per the stages of specific claims research for measurable of progress.

8. Determination of the amount of funding and stacking

Funding will be awarded to each eligible recipient based on:

First Nations are required to declare any and all sources of funding to support the research, development and submission of claims that are expected to be received or are received, including all funding from the Government of Canada and from provincial, territorial and municipal governments. Annual financial reporting must show all sources of funding received.

9. Application process

Applications for the research, development and submission of specific claims must be submitted to the Negotiation Support Directorate by the claims research unit or band or First Nation in accordance with the application deadline and must include the following:

Application for funding to support the planning and hosting costs of the National Claims Research Workshop, travel costs for delegates to attend and annual research directors meeting must be submitted to the Negotiation Support Directorate by the hosting community or hosting claims research unit, along with a proposed date and location, estimated number of participants and budget by January 31 of each fiscal year.

Application for funding to support the costs of the claims research units and First Nations involved in the claims process to participate in the annual research directors meeting should be included in their annual proposals along with an estimated budget.

Applications are to be submitted via email to dsnprp-nsdscp@rcaanc-cirnac.gc.ca and include in the subject line of the email, the following information: Name of the applicant – Year of proposal for the specific claims research funding submission.

To the attention of:
Director, Negotiation Support Directorate
Fiscal Branch
Treaties and Aboriginal Government Sector

To access annual or multi-year work plan and budget templates to assist with the application process, please contact Negotiation Support Directorate using the following generic e-mail address: dsnprp-nsdscp@rcaanc-cirnac.gc.ca.

Continued discussions on potential approaches to improve the funding application process for the research, development and submission of specific claims in the future are underway with the claims research units and Negotiation Support Directorate working group.

10. Reporting Requirements

The reporting requirements (program and financial reports) are listed in the recipient's contribution agreement, and details on these requirements are available in the Reporting Guide.

Specific claims contribution research and development funding must be reported separately from any other funding received by the First Nation.

11. Claims research units

Claims research units in British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Ontario, Quebec and Atlantic offer services and expertise to bands and First Nations to support research, development and submission of claims. Services are to be delivered by the claims research unit as per the mandate given by the member bands and First Nations.

The claims research unit shall establish ongoing communications with First Nations to ensure needs and accountabilities are met in accordance with the mandate given.

Specific claims contribution research and development funding must be reported by the claims research unit separately from any other funding received by the First Nation.

Appendix 1: Stages of specific claims research for measurement of progress

It is understood by all parties that researching claims is not necessarily a linear process and that events and research may dictate moving back and forth to different stages within this basic framework. It should also be noted that this list of stages is not necessarily all inclusive, nor will all research projects follow these stages which means that stages are not limited to the ones listed. However, these stages will likely apply to the processes and stages for most research for the vast majority of claims.

These stages were developed in consultation with claims research units as a general reference about the potential stages that research might go through as a claim proceeds from identification through to acceptance for negotiation.

In addition, new stages may be identified as the research and development of specific claims evolves under future reforms to the Specific Claims Policy and new research requirements are identified that cannot be anticipated at this time. There is a possibility that this stage of the process may need to be re-assessed after a number of claims have proceeded to and past this point of the process.

These stages have been adopted as a tool for understanding and reporting on the progress in specific claims research. Only the stages identified in Roman numerals would be required. The lettered bullets under each 'stage' are merely to provide information in this document to funding officers as to the kinds of activities that the researchers generally undertake during that particular stage. If the funding officer requires more information or clarification about the work being undertaken in the stage, they will contact the research funding recipients.

An annual review of the "stages" document should occur periodically at the National Research Directors' meeting to ensure the document accurately accounts for work being done. These reviews will be undertaken jointly.

Research stages

I. Identification and assessment of claim

  1. Identification of potential claim
    1. This usually involves meetings with chief and council at the community
    2. This could include informal or formal discussions with Elders or other members with some knowledge of the issue
    3. Potential claim could also be identified during research on another issue
    4. At this stage there is already a requirement for funding to support the preliminary identification and assessment of a claim
  2. Preliminary assessment of claim
    1. Does potential claim might meet criteria for a specific claim or might it be better resolved through some other process?
    2. Should more preliminary research be carried out prior to placing on the research work plan?
    3. In some cases, beneficiary issues (for example, in the case of splits, amalgamations and transfers, which current First Nations might be involved, need to be addressed. If this is the case, then discussions are required with the affected First Nations to advise them of the issue, explain the potential claim and its possible implications and allow the First Nations to decide what action should be taken
    4. Assessing the claim's potential routes is important and requires funding to do this. Some claims may be submitted to specific claims, but part of the claim may be dealt with in another process (for example, administrative resolution)
    5. Discuss potential claim with funding officer and get a number assigned
  3. Potential claim feasibility report
    1. May involve liaison with legal counsel for purposes of determining the potential for disclosure of an outstanding obligation of the federal Crown
    2. May indicate that there is a basis for a claim: what basis will be
    3. May indicate there is no basis for a claim and give reasons for finding
    4. It should be noted that, in either case, some level of detailed research is required to provide First Nations with comprehensive answer on issue
    5. Present claim feasibility report to First Nations.

II. Preliminary research

  1. Develop general work plan for claim
    1. Preliminary analysis to define research objectives, including review of relevant case law
    2. Determine whether additional funding is required in order to initiate the project. Consult with funding officer on this
    3. Develop specific research plan based on material reviewed
  2. Preliminary research
    1. Identify potential sources of information such as archival holdings, provincial and federal government ministries, who should be interviewed, whether relevant land use or status information is available, etc.
    2. If a new or unique issue is uncovered, canvassing other claims research units to determine whether any background research developed may be available for review
    3. Begin accessing files, collecting information
    4. Revisions to research plan
    5. Create database for documents used in claim
    6. Scan documents or prepare for scanning

III. In-depth research

  1. Collect information
    1. Continue collecting files and relevant information
    2. Conduct interviews, if applicable. This could include interviewing community members (for example, Elders) to gather evidence. Also liaison, preparation of draft questions, community visits, transcribing, translation if necessary, checking and reviewing, etc.
    3. Other field work
    4. Begin processing documents by collating, annotating, entry into database, creating indices, scanning all documents and filing all documents. This activity continues throughout the claim research and writing process as the researcher builds the claim
  2. Waiting for information
    1. Being processed by Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs Canada, Indigenous Services Canada, Library and Archives Canada, provincial and federal ministry, etc. This can create lengthy delays, as much as 6 to 12 months
  3. Review information for gaps
    1. Conduct additional research, if necessary
  4. Analysis
    1. This involves assessing the information and determining the best approach for arguing the claim before writing begins. If this is a new class of claim that no one else has looked at, it may involve researching and resolving some of the legal issues at this stage
    2. This may involve extensive genealogical analysis, for example, a treaty land entitlement claim
    3. This may also involve reviewing the general history of the surrounding area, including the historical foundation of the claim in relation to neighboring First Nations
  5. Follow up research
    1. This may involve conducting research as requested by legal counsel as per discussion and review

IV. Write-up

  1. Begin writing claim
    1. May identify additional gaps in research as writing proceeds
    2. Address gaps by doing additional research into specific subjects in gaps
  2. Final write-up of researcher and analyst draft
    1. Finalize background, history and detail specific issues
    2. Editing, fact checking and quote checking, etc.
    3. In cases where the claim is developed by a claims research unit, the finished report can go through a review process in which the other researchers will be consulted and will offer suggestions for revisions, additions, deletions, etc.
    4. Finalize document production, including digitization, creation, finalizing database, scanning and linking documents
    5. Presentation research report or follow up report to First Nations
  3. Determination of whether the claim value might exceed $150 Million.

V. Legal analysis

Consultation with legal counsel may be required at any point in the research and development of a potential specific claim.

  1. Legal analysis and research
    1. Identification of legal issues and arguments
    2. Liaison
    3. Identification of applicable case law precedent
    4. Identifying any necessary supplementary research based on legal review. Research may be required to return to Stage III.
    5. Present legal analysis to First Nation
  2. Incorporation of legal arguments
    1. Adjustment or reorganization of claim to highlight points emphasized by legal arguments; restructuring could include deletion or addition of sections
    2. Final review of claim by the researcher after incorporation of legal documents and arguments
  3. Final review of submission package
    1. Ensure it meets the minimum standard for filing a specific claim submission

VI. Submission to First Nation

  1. Preparation of draft claim to First Nations
    1. May involve preparation of a user friendly version of the claim, including an executive summary
    2. Present draft claim to First Nations
  2. Revisions to draft, if necessary
    1. Could include further research, analysis and write-up
    2. Could include further legal analysis
    3. Present revised draft claim to First Nations
  3. Preparation of final claim to First Nation
    1. Could include community general meeting to answer questions about the claim or provide community with historical information
    2. Additional revisions
    3. Present final claim to First Nation

It is important to note that at any time during the research and development of a claim, including the legal analysis of the issue, consultation with the First Nation may be required. This stage will be categorized as "Consultation with First Nation" and could occur at any time between Stage I and Stage VI.

VII. Submission to Specific Claims Branch

  1. Preparation for submission to Specific Claims Branch
    1. May include preparation of draft band council resolution for council consideration to include the mandatory acknowledgments in the submission of specific claims
    2. May include several meetings over a period of time with council
    3. Make additional copies of claim and submit to Specific Claims Branch on behalf of the First Nation
    4. Present claim to minister.
  2. Liaison between First Nation and Specific Claims Branch

VIII. Respond to Specific Claims Branch

  1. Specific Claims Branch letter of acknowledgment of receipt of First Nation submission
  2. Specific Claims Branch advises whether claim submission meets minimum standards
    1. May involve additional research by a claims research unit if Specific Claims Branch review identifies possible requirement
    2. May involve additional legal analysis by a claims research unit if Specific Claims Branch review identifies possible requirement
    3. If Specific Claims Branch advises that submission meets minimum standards, date of this acknowledgment signifies start of 3 year period for Specific Claims Branch review and response on claim regarding acceptance for negotiations
    4. If additional documentary evidence uncovered in Specific Claims Branch review of claim, this material is provided to the First Nation (and affected claims research unit, if involved.) This could lead to the claim being withdrawn and redrafted for submission to Specific Claims Branch
    5. May be interaction between Specific Claims Branch and the claims research unit between date of formal acceptance of claim and response to the claim submission
    6. Present updated claim (minimum standard) to minister

IX. Following minister's decision letter

  1. Receipt of minister's letter to explain the Government of Canada's decision to accept or reject the claim
  2. Clarification
    1. May involve meetings with Specific Claims Branch or Justice Canada to clarify legal considerations
  3. Assistance to First Nation after minister's letter advising whether the Government of Canada wishes to negotiate the claim
    1. Prior to a First Nation accepting the Government of Canada's offer to negotiate, a First Nation may require assistance or information from the claims research unit or legal counsel
    2. Could involve additional copying of documents for legal counsel, negotiations or possibly for the Specific Claim Tribunal process.
  4. Possible additional work required to both the historical and legal submissions

In some cases, stage IX of the process may include the option of mediation. Activities associated with the costs of litigation and Specific Claims Tribunal are not eligible under the Specific Claims Research, Development and Submission Program.

X. Inactive

Inactive for various reasons, this may occur at any of the above stages.

  1. Inactive: work on claim has not commenced
  2. Inactive: work suspended (for example, priorities changed for specific reasons, such as another response came back from Specific Claims Branch unexpectedly and had to address or research issues, questions, First Nation requests suspension of research for various reasons or assigns higher priority to another claim due to current situation on the ground, etc.) or because the band does not provide direction to the claims research unit (in this case, the claim could be reactivated)
  3. Inactive: waiting for Specific Claims Branch response
  4. Inactive: waiting for Department of Justice Canada response
  5. Inactive: waiting for provincial response
  6. Inactive: waiting for Specific Claims Tribunal report
  7. Inactive: no direction from First Nation
  8. Inactive: other reason, please explain

Did you find what you were looking for?

What was wrong?

You will not receive a reply. Don't include personal information (telephone, email, SIN, financial, medical, or work details).
Maximum 300 characters

Thank you for your feedback

Date modified: